Tiny black holes from the dawn of time may be altering our planet's orbit, new study suggests
A study suggests primordial black holes may make planets and moons near us wobble. If measured experimentally, this will provide the first concrete proof such objects exist.
Some of the universe's oldest black holes swoop past our cosmic neighborhood at least once every decade, moving planets in their wake, a new study suggests. And if scientists can detect them, it would provide the first proof that these black holes exist as dark matter.
Black holes, regions of immense gravity that even trap light, are some of the cosmos' most bizarre objects. But arguably the strangest among them are primordial black holes (PBHs). Astronomers have hypothesized that PBHs formed when dense, hot regions of space collapsed in the second immediately following the Big Bang.
Depending on when they were born in this one-second interval, PBHs are projected to have masses ranging from a hundred-thousandth the mass of a paper clip to that of 100,000 suns. But some scientists believe that PBHs with masses between asteroids like Juno and Eros are the most important because they may be primarily made of dark matter, a mysterious material that glues components of galaxies together.
There's a problem, though. No astronomical observations have ever definitively identified black holes of this type and mass (which, despite their asteroid-like mass, are "between the size of a hydrogen molecule and the size of an average bacterium," study authors Tung Tran, Sarah Geller, Benjamin Lehmann, and David Kaiser — all researchers at the Center for Theoretical Physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — wrote in a joint email to Live Science).
If such a PBH were to encounter Earth, it wouldn't destroy the planet. Yet the new study, published Dec. 28, 2023 on the preprint database arXiv, suggests PBHs should subtly affect objects in the solar system. If "a PBH flies by a planet, it starts that planet wobbling or rocking slightly around the path it was taking before the flyby," the authors wrote in the email.
That means the distances of planets from the sun — or from us — will change over time. Measuring these periodic oscillations in distance could reveal a PBH's passage.
Related: James Webb telescope discovers oldest black hole in the universe
To reach this conclusion, the researchers first calculated how closely a PBH would have to whizz past an object in the solar system to alter its movement. They found this distance could be very large — as much as a few astronomical units or AUs. (One AU is the distance from Earth to the sun.)
Using data about the positions of planets and certain moons from the JPL Horizons database (which records the positions of an additional 1 million solar system objects), the researchers performed simulations to calculate how the trajectories of the planets or moons would change, assuming a PBH with the mass of an asteroid came within 2 AUs of the sun. Over a period of years, the orbits of the planets and moons would wobble by around 1 or more inches or even several feet.
However, actually detecting these wobbles and confirming they are the result of PBH flybys will be extremely challenging. It turns out we have pretty precise measurements of how far certain celestial objects are from Earth, thanks to numerous space missions — for instance, Martian rovers have helped calibrate the Earth-Mars distance to within 4 inches (10 centimeters). But this isn't the case with other celestial bodies. The error margins of some measurements are very similar to the distances by which the planets would likely get pushed by a PBH, according to the study.
So even if the paths of such objects changed, astronomers wouldn't be able to say if it was because of an instrument error or an actual PBH. What's needed, the researchers said, are more precise simulations and higher-quality observations.
Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
Deepa Jain is a freelance science writer from Bengaluru, India. Her educational background consists of a master's degree in biology from the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, and an almost-completed bachelor's degree in archaeology from the University of Leicester, UK. She enjoys writing about astronomy, the natural world and archaeology.
-
Dan the skeptic Puh-leez!!!! Atom sized black holes passing by at over 100 million miles away altering a planets orbit? You wanna know what else id bet they would alter?? How's about the stupid ligo/vrgo data that claims to have detected "merging black holes" and "magnetars" and "neutron stars" . It's nonsense! Space fairy tales! Nobody has seen a black hole, we have no proof they exist, we are being fed fantasy to keep your head in outer space!Reply -
seanrlu To the article author: did you intend to say they were "made of" dark matter, or "make up" dark matter, as in dark matter is comprised of these PBHs. Because that is my understanding, that PBHs are candidates to "be" dark matter. Not necessarily that they are made of dark matter.Reply
Anyways. To the other commenter, I don't think that constant velocity black holes create gravitational waves. Maybe that's what you're missing, and why you're confused... Because these PBHs are, by their nature - fast and weakly interacting. But what do I know. Honestly not much, PBHs are still just a hypothesis at this point. But the math and theory behind them is pretty clear on how they would interact if they in fact do exist.... Nothing made up about any of that. -
LaraK ah yes, the pesky issue of never having seen it and so just hypothesizing anything that fits within the boundaries of what we don't know which is quite a large space.Reply -
BlackStars
I do. absolutely agree with you Dan and this is what I stipulate with my work, explain and prove the reason why. Black Holes exist only between the ears of their believers. Black Holes is no more than a medieval times opine that misdirect and confuse the students on the most important subject of our short lifetime. This is about Black Stars and their Galaxy from which nobody on less density can escape. TLDan the skeptic said:Puh-leez!!!! Atom sized black holes passing by at over 100 million miles away altering a planets orbit? You wanna know what else id bet they would alter?? How's about the stupid ligo/vrgo data that claims to have detected "merging black holes" and "magnetars" and "neutron stars" . It's nonsense! Space fairy tales! Nobody has seen a black hole, we have no proof they exist, we are being fed fantasy to keep your head in outer space! -
sven
Then what invisible object with a mass of 4.1 million suns at the center of our galaxy are stars orbiting if black holes don't exist?Dan the skeptic said:Puh-leez!!!! Atom sized black holes passing by at over 100 million miles away altering a planets orbit? You wanna know what else id bet they would alter?? How's about the stupid ligo/vrgo data that claims to have detected "merging black holes" and "magnetars" and "neutron stars" . It's nonsense! Space fairy tales! Nobody has seen a black hole, we have no proof they exist, we are being fed fantasy to keep your head in outer space!
Most Popular
By Deepa Jain
By Tom Metcalfe
By Deepa Jain